Anyone who have read pride and prejudice please please help out me.?
does this paragraph about lady catherine de bourgh make sense? you don't necessarily hold to even understand the context, i just want an opinion:
Austen also creates the guise of Lady Catherine through the narrative of the story, which can be understood as her own thoughts or Elizabeth’s which, as the protagonist of the novel, often emulate those of Jane Austen anyway. She makes her dislike for Lady Catherine clear through, for example, the way she refers to Lady Catherine “delivering her opinion on every subject contained by so decisive a manner as proved that she was impracticable to have her judgment controverted.” There is a certain tone present surrounded by this description that makes Austen’s disapproval of Lady Catherine’s self-righteous ways seem clear to us and, because we be delirious from her perspective, this contributes to our own disapproval of her.
Answers:
The dog goes moo.
The lamb goes silent.
Well done. If these are your own words, you've made them almost as complicated as the book itself.
But I do get the gist of it. And I haven't read the book but I deduce it's a good analysis.
It sounds fine but specifically take out the part the other answerer quoted for you. You don't need it and it read a little confusing.
I would also add a bit more to your explanation of why you chose the particular quote you did to illustrate the persona of Lady Catherine and why we are supposed to feel the way we do about her. For example:
"There is a unmistaken tone present in this description that makes Austen's disapproval of Lady Catherine's self-righteous ways clear to us by the use of words such as 'delivering', 'decisive' and 'controverted'. Their effect on the reader is..."
...and finish your paragraph sour. You'll show greater understanding of the character and use of words :)
Sounds fine to me
This all makes sense, but I think you could bestow out the part explaining that Jane Austen and Elizabeth's views are the same - you come across to spend a lot of time explaining that, rather than actually making your point.
I'd simply cut this: " which can be couched as her own thoughts or Elizabeth’s which, as the protagonist of the novel, often reflect those of Jane Austen anyway" - this is adjectives anyway so you don't need to spell it out in so much detail.
Related Questions:
What are some really virtuous books to read going on for the insurgent militias within the African Congo?
Time to write one then, Jimmy! i dont think they are any. especially about the radical militias. Source(s): i live in congo
Ranger apprentice series?
who thinks it stupid that the next rangers apprentice book(#7 eraks ransom) comes out contained by 2010 when its already out in australia. i know thats where the author lives but i can hardly dawdle for the next one. the ending of the last one be amazing. who agrees? Haha, I live in Australia so I've already read them. They're...
Austen also creates the guise of Lady Catherine through the narrative of the story, which can be understood as her own thoughts or Elizabeth’s which, as the protagonist of the novel, often emulate those of Jane Austen anyway. She makes her dislike for Lady Catherine clear through, for example, the way she refers to Lady Catherine “delivering her opinion on every subject contained by so decisive a manner as proved that she was impracticable to have her judgment controverted.” There is a certain tone present surrounded by this description that makes Austen’s disapproval of Lady Catherine’s self-righteous ways seem clear to us and, because we be delirious from her perspective, this contributes to our own disapproval of her.
Answers:
The dog goes moo.
The lamb goes silent.
Well done. If these are your own words, you've made them almost as complicated as the book itself.
But I do get the gist of it. And I haven't read the book but I deduce it's a good analysis.
It sounds fine but specifically take out the part the other answerer quoted for you. You don't need it and it read a little confusing.
I would also add a bit more to your explanation of why you chose the particular quote you did to illustrate the persona of Lady Catherine and why we are supposed to feel the way we do about her. For example:
"There is a unmistaken tone present in this description that makes Austen's disapproval of Lady Catherine's self-righteous ways clear to us by the use of words such as 'delivering', 'decisive' and 'controverted'. Their effect on the reader is..."
...and finish your paragraph sour. You'll show greater understanding of the character and use of words :)
Sounds fine to me
This all makes sense, but I think you could bestow out the part explaining that Jane Austen and Elizabeth's views are the same - you come across to spend a lot of time explaining that, rather than actually making your point.
I'd simply cut this: " which can be couched as her own thoughts or Elizabeth’s which, as the protagonist of the novel, often reflect those of Jane Austen anyway" - this is adjectives anyway so you don't need to spell it out in so much detail.
Related Questions:
What are some really virtuous books to read going on for the insurgent militias within the African Congo?
Time to write one then, Jimmy! i dont think they are any. especially about the radical militias. Source(s): i live in congo
Ranger apprentice series?
who thinks it stupid that the next rangers apprentice book(#7 eraks ransom) comes out contained by 2010 when its already out in australia. i know thats where the author lives but i can hardly dawdle for the next one. the ending of the last one be amazing. who agrees? Haha, I live in Australia so I've already read them. They're...